Delayed iPhone X launch hurt market share, Kantar report

Apple CEO Tim Cook (L) takes a picture with David Casarez (R) who just purchased the new iPhone X at an Apple Store on November 3, 2017 in Palo Alto, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Apple CEO Tim Cook (L) takes a picture with David Casarez (R) who just purchased the new iPhone X at an Apple Store on November 3, 2017 in Palo Alto, California.

Apple’s delayed launch of the iPhone X hurt the iPhone market share around the world, research firm Kantar Worldpanel said on Tuesday.

div > div.group > p:first-child”/>

Apple launched the iPhone X in the beginning of November, instead of in September when it launched the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus.

It’s this window that Kantar believes may have hurt Apple’s market share. Data from Kantar shows that Apple’s share fell by 7.6 percentage points in the U.S. during the October quarter, compared to the same period last year. Likewise, it slipped 8.5 percentage points in Great Britain, 1.6 percentage points in Germany, 6.9 percentage points in Japan and 2.1 percentage points in the European Union Five. Android saw growth in all of those markets except in China.

“It was somewhat inevitable that Apple would see volume share fall once we had a full comparative month of sales taking into account the non-flagship iPhone 8 vs. the flagship iPhone 7 from 2016,” said Dominic Sunnebo, Global Business Unit Director for Kantar Worldpanel ComTech. “This decrease is significant and puts pressure on the iPhone X to perform. Considering the complete overhaul that the iPhone X offers, consumers may be postponing their purchase decisions until they can test the iPhone X and decide whether the higher price, compared to the iPhone 8, is worth the premium to them.”

Despite this, Apple said earlier this year that sales during the last quarter exceeded expectations and were up 3 percent year-on-year. The iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus quickly became Apple’s most popular iPhone models and remained the best-selling until the iPhone X went on sale. Also, Apple’s iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus roll-out wasn’t completed until the end of October, so some markets didn’t yet have those phones.

Early reports had suggested Apple pushed the launch of the iPhone X due to supply issues, though that hasn’t seemed to be much of an issue. While supply did seem limited initially, the iPhone X is now much easier to buy without much of a wait.

Read the full report from Kantar Worldpanel.

Opinion: Call of Duty: WW2’s Server Mess and Bugs Badly Hurt an Otherwise Good Game

Normandy Seashore has been deserted for just about a week in my copy of Contact of Obligation: WW2. What is actually intended to be a Destiny 2-like social hub is rather something akin to a ghost town. I cannot even full 1 of the initial social missions in which I am intended to commend a fellow soldier.

It is really only the most seen symptom of what has ailed Phone of Obligation: WW2 because it launched this time very last week. Around the previous 7 days, players have reported lots of complications with glitchy servers, online games likely unrecorded, bugs, and weapon balance.

1 significantly horrible bug is the so-known as “Prestige Bug,” which triggers immediately after you max out your degree and enter Prestige Mode. The bug resets the preliminary Welcome to Headquarters quest even though blocking you from getting new orders from Key Howard—a enormous dilemma offered that they are an great supply of source drops.

Late past evening, developer Sledgehammer Video games produced a somewhat massive patch intended to tackle many of the difficulties highlighted by lovers. But server problems appear to be just as negative as just before, and some gamers are reporting that well-regarded problems like the Prestige Bug persist.



“Double XP is broken, disconnects are non-halt, orders are continue to broken, seven days devoid of any key fixes,” one enthusiast complained on Reddit adhering to the update.

Another wrote, “Hottest update broke matchmaking for me. Been hunting for a match for the past 20 minutes, consistently stating 40+ probable video games identified but nothing.”

Sledgehammer Online games has been periodically posting updates on Twitter.

Phone of Obligation: WW2’s issues have no question place a damper on what is in some methods an intriguing and formidable recreation.

The new “War Manner” in unique is staying lauded by several as just one of Simply call of Duty’s very best additions in a long time. A multi-stage multiplayer mode in the vein of Battlefield 1’s Operations, it includes a comprehensive-blown multiplayer Battle of Normandy, with a single aspect assaulting the seashores whilst the other defends. It really is a method that feels real to the matter matter while freshening up the principal gameplay.

You know, when it works.

Server concerns and bugs have led to unfounded accusations that Sledgehammer Game titles isn’t going to treatment, exactly where the reality is that they ended up basically possibly also bold for their have excellent.



Look at the Headquarters: A Destiny-model multiplayer hub that has been bolted on major of Contact of Duty’s common multiplayer. On paper, it need to have appeared amazing—a complete-blown hub the place you could wander all over Omaha Beach, obtain orders, and interact with other gamers.

But in apply, it is really a incredibly advanced setting with heavier gameplay hooks than you may generally obtain even in Destiny. It consists of minigames, a lot of shops, and the potential to get supply drops. There are so many methods in play that it can be no wonder that it really is so damaged.

This is not to justification Sledgehammer Game titles: If you might be going to introduce an bold social hub, you would much better make positive it performs. But it does spotlight how effortlessly even a huge-spending budget activity like Phone of Responsibility can go poorly completely wrong.

Unfortunately, these troubles have been all too prevalent this year, and it’s only apt to get even worse.

Contact of Duty and the Price tag of Working a Provider Recreation

Call of Obligation: WW2 is just the most recent “service match” to struggle out of the gate in 2017.

Sport game titles in distinct have experienced a hard time of it. MLB The Clearly show 17’s server issues were so undesirable that early online gatherings experienced to be canceled. NBA 2K18 had significant troubles with disappearing Digital Currency.



As far more and additional knowledge is saved on remote servers, the infrastructure is becoming a lot more fragile. Server outages and glitches are breaking full games.

This is what is fueling the anger at the rear of the problems bedeviling games like Get in touch with of Duty: WW2. Not only are enthusiasts possessing to offer with an inflow of microtransaction-weighty mechanics, now their most popular video game isn’t really working adequately as a outcome of their inclusion.

On line game titles are receiving far more bold by the calendar year, but the accompanying increase in backend challenges is massively disheartening. It is receiving to the stage where it truly is not even really worth picking up a activity at start provided how significantly the inevitable mega patches will in the end change factors.

I have no doubt that Sledgehammer Online games will eventually get factors beneath handle, specially as the preliminary surge of gamers move on to greener pastures. But becoming scarcely functional at start shouldn’t be the price of creating an evergreen “assistance recreation.”

Unfortunately, if 2017 is any sign, we are truly via the seeking glass when it will come to these types of on the internet platforms. And I question the accompanying tech challenges are going to get better any time quickly.

This article may possibly comprise backlinks to online retail shops. If you click on on one and acquire the product we could obtain a little commission. For far more information and facts, go in this article.

http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Will Competition From Nvidia and AMD Hurt Intel’s Earnings? – October 24, 2017

As we head further into the busiest stretch of the Q3 earnings season, investors are starting to turn their attention to the upcoming report from Intel (INTC Free Report) , the largest semiconductor company in the world. This chip-making behemoth will release its third-quarter financial results on Thursday, October 26.

The semiconductor industry has been red-hot in 2017, especially as demand from emerging markets like cloud computing and the Internet of Things continues to heat up. However, Intel shares—which are up 12.5% on the year—have lagged the industry’s gains.

Intel’s earnings report will still serve as an important bellwether for the entire technology sector, but the stock has struggled to gain momentum as investors have become increasingly concerned with the chipmaker’s competition.

Recently, Intel has felt pressure from the likes of Nvidia (NVDA Free Report) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD Free Report) . Nvidia’s artificial intelligence processors are already at the forefront of the booming AI industry, while AMD has doubled down on its server chips. And both of these companies compete with Intel in the ever-important gaming segment.

But have Nvidia and AMD done enough to put a dent in Intel’s upcoming earnings report? Well, one approach to answering this question is to focus on Intel’s core business segments.

Luckily, by using our exclusive non-financial metrics estimates file, we can gauge analyst sentiment and predict the company’s performance in its key units.  These important, stock-driving estimates are updated daily and are based on the independent research of expert stock analysts. Learn more here>>>

Because of Nvidia and AMD’s popularity in the gaming market, we might expect to see an impact in Intel’s Client Computing Group. This business segment includes the company’s products designed for notebooks and desktops, so it could certainly feel the effects of these gaming-friendly chipmakers.

According to our latest consensus estimates, the Client Computing Group is expected to post revenues of $8.62 billion, which would represent a slump of about 3% from the $8.89 billion posted in the year-ago period.

Still, while this dip could imply that Intel is losing some market share in the personal computing space, the company has made some strides in this area recently. For example, Intel recently launched its eighth-generation Core processors, which should lift the company’s gaming endeavors.

And on top of this, the Client Computing Group has been a surprise performer for Intel this year. In fact, in the second quarter, Intel posted revenues of $8.21 billion in this unit. That results smashed our consensus estimate of $7.82 billion and marked year-over-year growth of nearly 12%.

Heading into its report, Intel is sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). The stock also has a positive Earnings ESP of 0.06%, so we can feel more confident about the company’s chance at an earnings beat.

Intel shares are sitting near their 52-week, but if the company can outperform again—especially in key categories like Client Computing—the stock might just break into a new range (also read: 3 Key Estimates for Intel’s Q3 Earnings Report).

Make sure to check back here for our full analysis once Intel releases its report later this week!

Want more stock market analysis from this author? Make sure to follow @Ryan_McQueeney on Twitter!

Today’s Stocks from Zacks’ Hottest Strategies

It’s hard to believe, even for us at Zacks. But while the market gained +18.8% from 2016 – Q1 2017, our top stock-picking screens have returned +157.0%, +128.0%, +97.8%, +94.7%, and +90.2% respectively.

And this outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. Over the years it has been remarkably consistent. From 2000 – Q1 2017, the composite yearly average gain for these strategies has beaten the market more than 11X over. Maybe even more remarkable is the fact that we’re willing to share their latest stocks with you without cost or obligation.

See Them Free>>

Will Competition From Nvidia and AMD Hurt Intel’s Earnings?

As we head further into the busiest stretch of the Q3 earnings season, investors are starting to turn their attention to the upcoming report from Intel INTC , the largest semiconductor company in the world. This chip-making behemoth will release its third-quarter financial results on Thursday, October 26.

The semiconductor industry has been red-hot in 2017, especially as demand from emerging markets like cloud computing and the Internet of Things continues to heat up. However, Intel shares-which are up 12.5% on the year-have lagged the industry’s gains.

Intel’s earnings report will still serve as an important bellwether for the entire technology sector, but the stock has struggled to gain momentum as investors have become increasingly concerned with the chipmaker’s competition.

Recently, Intel has felt pressure from the likes of Nvidia NVDA and Advanced Micro Devices AMD . Nvidia’s artificial intelligence processors are already at the forefront of the booming AI industry, while AMD has doubled down on its server chips. And both of these companies compete with Intel in the ever-important gaming segment.

But have Nvidia and AMD done enough to put a dent in Intel’s upcoming earnings report? Well, one approach to answering this question is to focus on Intel’s core business segments.

Luckily, by using our exclusive non-financial metrics estimates file, we can gauge analyst sentiment and predict the company’s performance in its key units.  These important, stock-driving estimates are updated daily and are based on the independent research of expert stock analysts. Learn more here>>>

Because of Nvidia and AMD’s popularity in the gaming market, we might expect to see an impact in Intel’s Client Computing Group. This business segment includes the company’s products designed for notebooks and desktops, so it could certainly feel the effects of these gaming-friendly chipmakers.

According to our latest consensus estimates, the Client Computing Group is expected to post revenues of $8.62 billion, which would represent a slump of about 3% from the $8.89 billion posted in the year-ago period.

Still, while this dip could imply that Intel is losing some market share in the personal computing space, the company has made some strides in this area recently. For example, Intel recently launched its eighth-generation Core processors, which should lift the company’s gaming endeavors.

And on top of this, the Client Computing Group has been a surprise performer for Intel this year. In fact, in the second quarter, Intel posted revenues of $8.21 billion in this unit. That results smashed our consensus estimate of $7.82 billion and marked year-over-year growth of nearly 12%.

Heading into its report, Intel is sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). The stock also has a positive Earnings ESP of 0.06%, so we can feel more confident about the company’s chance at an earnings beat.

Intel shares are sitting near their 52-week, but if the company can outperform again-especially in key categories like Client Computing-the stock might just break into a new range (also read: 3 Key Estimates for Intel’s Q3 Earnings Report ).

Make sure to check back here for our full analysis once Intel releases its report later this week!

Want more stock market analysis from this author? Make sure to follow @ Ryan_McQueeney on Twitter!

Today’s Stocks from Zacks’ Hottest Strategies

It’s hard to believe, even for us at Zacks. But while the market gained +18.8% from 2016 – Q1 2017, our top stock-picking screens have returned +157.0%, +128.0%, +97.8%, +94.7%, and +90.2% respectively.

And this outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. Over the years it has been remarkably consistent. From 2000 – Q1 2017, the composite yearly average gain for these strategies has beaten the market more than 11X over. Maybe even more remarkable is the fact that we’re willing to share their latest stocks with you without cost or obligation.

See Them Free>>

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD): Free Stock Analysis Report

Intel Corporation (INTC): Free Stock Analysis Report

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Zacks Investment Research

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

How the Napa Fires Could Hurt 2017’s Wine Grapes

Nick Goldschmidt has been lucky so far. A wildfire has burned more than 8,000 acres just north of his vineyards in Geyserville, California, but so far his vines are OK. So is his house in Healdsburg, roughly midway between Geyserville and a 36,000-acre fire that destroyed more than 2,800 homes in Santa Rosa.

But now, amid the charred, empty spaces that scar northern California’s winegrowing region, under skies yellowed by smoke, Goldschmidt has a race to win. Wildfires can ruin the flavor of wine grapes, a problem called smoke taint. “I’ve worked with smoke before,” Goldschmidt says. “It is not an easy thing to fix. But in my experience, it’s more about contact time. So the key thing is, if you have vineyards near the fire, you’ve got to get the grapes off.”

Depending on wind, smoke from the Atlas Fire could potentially reach Goldschmidt’s Napa vineyard, where about 15 percent of the fruit remains to be harvested. He now plans to harvest the rest by the weekend.

That’s typical of Napa, where 80 to 85 percent of the 2017 harvest is done. In nearby Sonoma, 90 percent of the grapes are in. But that still means that a few grapes could get exposed to smoke, and fire and heat could damage the vines. In a region key to California’s $34 billion wine industry—and that figure doesn’t even include the enormous tourist business—that’s a big deal. Fires have killed 31 people so far, destroyed thousands of homes, and consumed the efforts of more than 8,000 firefighters. And the winemakers of the area are trying to make sure the damage to their livelihoods doesn’t get worse.

Winemaking regions around the world, especially in Australia, have been dealing with the consequences of more active fire seasons near vineyards since at least the turn of the century—but the problems haven’t really hit California yet. The state’s frequent fires haven’t intersected with its vineyards. Until now.

Smoke is complicated stuff. Everyone in the Bay Area has gotten a taste in the past few days—that medicinal, ashy, burnt flavor comes from, among other ingredients, molecules called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrogen and sulfur oxides, other organic compounds, and even tiny particles carried aloft by heat and air currents. If you’ve ever sat near a campfire or cooked on a grill, you know it’s not necessarily an unpleasant aroma, as cognitively dissonant as that may feel when you realize it comes from blazes that have destroyed the lives of thousands.

But what’s delicious in bacon or lox generally isn’t—depending on how much you have—in wine. The actual flavor compounds are molecules called volatile phenols. “Volatile” means they evaporate, and in chemistry “phenols” are benzene rings (a hexagon of carbon atoms with hydrogen atoms sticking off like a snowflake) connected to a hydrogen-and-an-oxygen. You might know them better as the aroma of peat in some whiskies or of antiseptic or Band-Aids. Their volatility means that in your mouth, they turn into a vapor that gets sucked up retronasally, through the back of the throat to the sensitive layer of nerve endings behind your nose that translates chemicals into odors.

Smoke taint in grapes has two specific markers: guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol. They taste like, well, smoke. Expose grapes on the vine to them, and the wine will taste smoky. Obvious, right? Except no. “The mechanism is a little bit unclear,” says Kerry Wilkinson, an oenologist who studies smoke taint at the University of Adelaide. Leaves have pores called stomata involved in respiration, “but when grapevines are exposed to smoke, the stomata close almost immediately and photosynthesis stops,” [wait. Grapes are fruit. They don’t photosynthesize, do they?] she says. “The guaiacol conjugates are getting to not only the skins but the pulp of the fruit. I think it’s just permeation, but I don’t think anyone’s done the research.”

Making things even more complicated, grapevines have their own way of dealing with a barbecue. “Those compounds, once they’re taken up, the grapevine will stick one or more sugar molecules on them,” Wilkinson says. “We think that’s to make them less toxic to the plant.” This process—it’s called glycosylation, and the sugars are called glycosides—turns the volatile phenols non-volatile. Which means you can’t taste them in the grape juice.

But ferment that juice into wine, and acids in it will break those sugars off. Poof: Smoke gets in your wines.

I don’t mean to be flip here; smoke taint from the Canberra bushfires of 2003 cost Australian vineyards more than $4 million; fires in 2004 cost another $7 million. Once grapes are tainted, the wine isn’t easy to fix. Those ashy flavors are too strong; you can’t just try to blend in other, untainted wine to cover it up. Efforts to filter it with activated charcoal and reverse osmosis can filter out flavors you might want in the wine, too. Heck, guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol are markers for oak-barrel aging, too. Nobody ever describes an over-oaked Chardonnay as “smoke-tainted,” but—well, maybe they should, actually. And some grape varietals—shiraz, particularly—already have naturally high guaiacol levels.

All of which might be fine. Most of the grapes were picked before the fires came. In general, “if the fruit’s already been harvested this year, it should be OK,” Wilkinson says. A couple dozen wineries suffered damage so far, from minor to total. But Northern California has almost 250,000 acres of wine grape vines—more than 100,000 of them in Napa and Sonoma Counties as of 2016.

It looks like the grapes those vines produce will be OK next year. “There’s no carryover effect from one season to the other,” Wilkinson says. “We haven’t seen any evidence to suggest that any of those smoke compounds are bound up from one season to another in the grapevine.” They get into the grapes, which come off, and the leaves, which fall off or get pruned. (And a little more luck: The grapes left to harvest in Napa are mostly Cabernet Sauvignon, which turns out to be more resistant to smoke taint than some other varietals.)

But vines themselves are sensitive to heat. “They can be scorched, and if it’s severe, that can permanently damage or kill grapevines,” Wilkinson says. “If there’s just a little bit of scorching, vines can recover, but the yield can be decreased in the season immediately after.”

It turns out it’s pretty hard to burn down a California vineyard. In part that’s because most of them are irrigated, so they’re wet and thus resistant to fire. Even when the cover crop growing between the vines gets burned in a fast-moving wildfire, “it’s pretty damn hard” to get a California vineyard to catch, Goldschmidt says.

When he was working in Chile, though, he saw a wind-driven wildfire very much like the ones affecting California destroy a vineyard. “That was devastating,” Goldschmidt says. “A lot of those vineyards are dry-farmed, so they burned much more easily.”

Heat damage is a lot like frost damage, something California vintners know a lot about. Proper pruning and treatment can save an injured vine. The trick is knowing if they’re injured, and how badly. Sometimes vintners will have to cut through the trunks of the vines to assess whether the phloem, the living and respiring part of the wood, is still healthy. But that’s a destructive test—sometimes destroying the vine in an attempt to save it.

So grape-growers look for other ways to assess their vines. “We look at things like, are the irrigation lines melted? Is there indication of scorching of the trunk and canopy? How much fire damage was there to anything growing in between the vines?” Wilkinson says.

That’s an assessment that’ll probably have to wait until the fires are under control. Maybe Goldschmidt’s luck will hold out. “This is my 29th vintage in Sonoma. It’s the first time the Alexander Valley was earlier in maturity than the Napa Valley. Usually it’s 10 days later,” he says. “If it had been the other way I would have really been hammered.”

Ordinarily I might end the story with that, but in this case it’s not as lucky as it sounds. Napa and Sonoma did indeed have a weird year. It rained hard after years of drought, and then over the summer it got really hot. Vintners irrigated when they might not have, which lowered the sugar levels in the grapes as they took up the water…and then it got hot again. “It’s been really hard to make a harvest decision based on sugar,” Goldschmidt says. “It’s been more about flavor and tannin.”

Based on those organoleptic assessments—the fanciest possible way of saying “how it tastes”—most of Napa and Sonoma brought in their fruit in July and August instead of, well, now.

To whom should the vintners send a thank-you? “Over the last five years or so we’ve had this period of very high temperatures that coincided with low precipitation, punctuated by very wet conditions,” says Noah Diffenbaugh, a climate researcher at Stanford. It’s exactly what Diffenbaugh’s group warned would happen in a prescient 2006 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences titled “Extreme heat reduces and shifts United States premium wine production in the 21st century.”

Their point? At first, heat and rare-but-extreme rain is going to change how winegrowing regions work. Eventually more northerly regions will be better for grapes—hello, Oregon’s Willamette Valley—and existing grape-growing regions will change the varieties they grow.

It’s in the nature of global warming that extreme climate events will become less rare. “We’ve done a lot of work trying to understand how global warming impacts temperature extremes,” Diffenbaugh says. “The extremes are really where we feel the climate.”

The vagaries of climate change let the 2017 vintage mostly dodge the economic devastation that smoke taint would have caused. It’s a faintly silver lining to the clouds of ash and smoke now parked over thousands of acres of death and destruction. But that silver lining won’t last. These won’t be the last fires; next time, maybe the harvest won’t happen first. The most frightening truth about the extreme climate event that is the northern California fires is that such events won’t always be extreme. They’ll be normal.